![]() This means than the newer machine will be more capable to mix more stodgy mixtures for longer. For example, the A901 has a 450W motor, whereas the later KMC010 has a much more powerful 1400W motor. Older Chefs are less powerful than newer machines. Since I’ve dismantled, used and admired 100s of these machines, here’s my take. Some people think that new machines are best and more capable while other people think older machines are best as they were built to last. Many Chef accessories produced over the years are interchangeable, owning to the foresight of good design. The Chef is a good example for the shoot-out as the machine’s purpose hasn’t changed since it’s introduction to kitchens in the 1950s. My chosen opponents are a model from the early 1980s, the ubiquitous A901 Chef, made in England, and the much later 2000s KMC010 Chef, made in China. ![]() ![]() My illustration focuses on an old favourite of mine the Kenwood Chef. There is of course, no right or wrong answer and the answer will vary, depending on the product and application.īut since the question comes up from time-to-time, I thought I’d give my opinion on the matter and have a bit of fun with the subject, a kind of shoot-out if you will. Believe it or not, people do ask me which is best: New or old machines?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |